There were two recent articles in The Daily Telegraph regarding the ‘banning’ of books by Holocaust deniers. The first article, by Olivia Rudgard, reads:
“A Cambridge college has removed a David Irving book from display in its library after a visiting Jewish academic complained. Churchill College, Cambridge, said the Irving’s biography of its namesake, Winston Churchill , would now be held in a ‘closed access’ area with borrowers only able to read it on request.
“Dr Irene Lancaster, formerly a teaching fellow in Jewish history at Manchester University, encountered the books written by the Holocaust denier on display. She said: ‘They certainly weren’t hidden away – they were sticking out like reference books.’
“A spokesman for the university said: ‘Holding banned or challenged books in no way endorses the views or scholarship of the authors. Rather, they are accessible to scholars to allow them the opportunity to challenge and refute their contents’. The spokesman added that the library was used by college members and visiting academics and not the general public, and therefore the books had not been on ‘public display’.”
Wikipedia says this about Irving: “Sixteen years after an English court discredited his work and the judge called him ‘antisemitic and racist’, the historian David Irving claims he is inspiring a new generation of ‘Holocaust skeptics. On the eve of a major new Bafta-nominated film about the trial, Irving, who has dismissed what happened at Auschwitz concentration camp during the second world war as ‘Disneyland’, says that a whole new generation of young people have discovered his work via the internet and social media. . . . Irving v Penguin Books Ltd was one of the most infamous libel trials of the past 20 years. An American historian, Deborah Lipstadt, had accused him in her book, Denying the Holocaust, and Irving, then a somewhat respected if maverick historian, sued her and her publisher.” (And lost.)
I had a look on Amazon where there are plenty of David Irving’s books. His book, Churchill’s War, The Struggle for Power, has nine five-star reviews and one three-star review. The 3-star review complains about non-delivery of half of the e-book. The five-star reviews focus on the depth of research and the quality of historical writing. Many of the reviews mention Irving’s reputation, but say that this work is not biased.
The second article, by Robert Mendick:
“Amazon has bowed to public pressure and quietly removed from sale dozens of anti-Semitic books that deny the Holocaust. An outcry followed news it was profiting from titles such as The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews, by Carlo Mattogno, which was available as a download. Dr Nicholas Terry at the University of Exeter, said Amazon had last week withdrawn form sale more than 30 books. The expert on contemporary Holocaust denial added: ‘This is a major blow for Holocaust denying authors. Amazon has been a major outlet for their sales’. Despite the decision, Amazon still sells anti-Semitic literature through its website, and it is unclear what rules determine what material is acceptable and what is not. The company refused to comment.”
I would make three points about all of this:
- Non governmental organisations should be free to exclude material which they consider objectionable. The government should not have any such freedom.
- Amazon ought to be transparent about it’s policies, which should err in favour of exclusion of objectionable material.
- Any policy should be intelligent and selective, leaving ‘on the shelf’ quality, constructive books by objectionable authors.