Camilla Turner wrote an article for The Daily Telegraph in late April on the topic “Student ban on free speech ‘blight of our age’.” She said:
“Suppression of freedom of speech in universities is ‘one of the greatest problems of our time’, a former chancellor has warned. (A chancellor in the UK government is the finance minister.) Lord Lawson, who led the Conservative campaign for Brexit, said that political correctness was a ‘great blight of our age’, adding that students often have their way because of ‘totally supine’ university authorities.
“‘Safe space’ and ‘no platform’ movements have swept across campuses, including campaigns to ban speakers deemed offensive. But Lord Lawson, who served as chancellor in Margaret Thatcher’s government in the Eighties, said it was crucial that universities were independent from government. He went on: ‘But now we have a new problem in the university sector, which is not the problem of government control – though that always needs to be watched – but the problem of the suppression of free speech. The problem comes from political correctness to some extent, which is the great blight of this age. A view is either politically correct or not, and if it is not, then it should not be heard.’
“At an event to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the University of Buckingham, the UK’s first private university, he added, ‘This is happening throughout the universities today, where it is pushed by students. They may not be the majority of students, but they are very vocal and they have their way because of totally supine university authorities. The suppression of freedom of speech in the universities is now one of the great problems of our time’. A new higher education bill has been criticized by academics, who say universities will be forced to pander to the demands of ‘snowflake’ students.
I agree with Lord Lawson. There is entirely too much exclusion of what for some is painful dialogue on university campuses. One example is at my alma mater where the name of a college (my particular college, in fact) was changed because of student protests. The name of the college was Calhoun College, named for John C Calhoun (March 18, 1782 – March 31, 1850) who was an American statesman and political theorist from South Carolina and the seventh Viced President of the US from 1825 to 1832. He was also a two-term US Senator and US Secretary of State.He is remembered for strongly defending slavery and for advancing the concept of minority rights in politics, which he did in the context of defending Southern values from perceived Northern threats.
Wikipedia says this about Calhoun: “In Calhoun’s defense, Clyde Wilson, editor of the multi-volume The Papers of John C. Calhoun and a Distinguished Chair of the Abbeville Institute, argued: ‘Your ordinary run-of-the mill historian will tell you that John C. Calhoun, having defended the bad and lost causes of state rights and slavery, deserves to rest forever in the dustbin of history. Nothing could be further from the truth. No American public figure after the generation of the Founding Fathers has more to say to later times than Calhoun.’
While I can appreciate that Calhoun is an objectionable figure for many, is it necessary to expunge him from history? It seems to me that particularly at university level, one needs to reflect on the good and the bad. One needs to ask, “Why did they name this college after John C Calhoun? Would we do the same today? Why not? How have we changed?” It seems to me that there are some learning experiences in such a dialogue.
Besides, when one starts cleaning up names, where does one stop? Calhoun College (now called Grace Murray Hopper College) is part of Yale University. Founded in 1701, it was originally the Collegiate School of Connecticut, but it became Yale College after the gift of Elihu Yale, a slave trader.