On the Guardian website, February 20, 2010, there is an article, Ten Rules for Writing Fiction Parts 1 & 2, which caught my eye, mainly because of the writers who were offering their opinions. In this post I’ve picked out some that haven’t been covered before in this blog, and with which I agree or disagree.
Illustration: Andrzej Krauze from the article
Is this a metaphor for writing fiction or for the opinions about it?
- Hilary Mantel: “Description must work for its place. It can’t be simply ornamental. It usually works best if it has a human element; it is more effective if it comes from an implied viewpoint, rather than from the eye of God. If description is coloured by the viewpoint of the character who is doing the noticing, it becomes, in effect, part of character definition and part of the action.” I agree!
- Michael Moorcock: “If possible have something going on while you have your characters delivering exposition or philosophising. This helps retain dramatic tension.” and “Carrot and stick – have protagonists pursued (by an obsession or a villain) and pursuing (idea, object, person, mystery)” Good point.
- Will Self: ” You know that sickening feeling of inadequacy and over-exposure you feel when you look upon your own empurpled prose? Relax into the awareness that this ghastly sensation will never, ever leave you, no matter how successful and publicly lauded you become. It is intrinsic to the real business of writing and should be cherished.” I find this quite interesting; I had only feelings of pride for my first book when completed. More recently, with my eighth, I do feel that sense of inadequacy.
- Zacie Smith: “Tell the truth through whichever veil comes to hand – but tell it. Resign yourself to the lifelong sadness that comes from never being satisfied.” This is very similar to Will Self’s comment.
- Rose Tremain: “Forget the boring old dictum “write about what you know”. Instead, seek out an unknown yet knowable area of experience that’s going to enhance your understanding of the world and write about that.” I did just this with my last two novels. By the way, when one does this, one has to be connected to the Internet – contrary to the advice of several authors.
- Sarah Waters: “Writing fiction is not “self-expression” or “therapy”. Novels are for readers, and writing them means the crafty, patient, selfless construction of effects. I think of my novels as being something like fairground rides: my job is to strap the reader into their car at the start of chapter one, then trundle and whizz them through scenes and surprises, on a carefully planned route, and at a finely engineered pace.” I like the analogy.
- Jonathan Franzen: “Write in the third person unless a really distinctive first-person voice offers itself irresistibly.” I think this is probably good advice. Luckily the two novels I’ve written in the first person are distinctive.
- Esther Freud: “Cut out the metaphors and similes. In my first book I promised myself I wouldn’t use any and I slipped up during a sunset in chapter 11. I still blush when I come across it.” I don’t agree with this; I think that a whimsical, unexpected metaphor can be very enlightening.
- Neil Gaiman: “Fix it. Remember that, sooner or later, before it ever reaches perfection, you will have to let it go and move on and start to write the next thing. Perfection is like chasing the horizon. Keep moving.” I thought it was jut my compulsive self: noticing a problem in an earlier chapter and immediately rushing to find and fix it.
- P D James: “Increase your word power. Words are the raw material of our craft. The greater your vocabulary the more effective your writing. We who write in English are fortunate to have the richest and most versatile language in the world. Respect it.” I think this is an excellent point and it is contrary to some who encourage the use of common words or discourage the use of a thesaurus.